The Occult Cult of Celebrity and the Erosion of the Self.

The cult of celebrity is no different from the multifarious ancient cults of Gods, goddesses and mortals mixed up, often with fatal results, in the general spiritual hierarchy of the ancient world. Some Gods live forever (Paul McCartney) some are tragically poisoned (Amy Winehouse) and others are ensnared by their love for a woman (Kurt Kobain).

These people exist within our TV screens and the pages of the media as stars of the great cultural mystery play which we’re all presently spectators of. The media mystery play seems to be a gradual inculcation of the OTO lifestyle of sexuality being the only thing of importance and, so it would seem, the only thing worth singing about. What has happened to music? Why are songs on the radio seemingly being produced to sell more sex, and more sexual experience, and being ‘freaky’ and trying new things? ‘I kissed a girl and I liked it’ really? Or are you just trying to mess with little girls’ heads Katy? Do we really need more sex, most of us get it and tend to keep that stuff personal and private, drunken banter with mates excepted.
The reason most of the celebrities are up on stage being millionaires and hugely successful and worshiped by half of the world are twofold. Firstly they are there because they need to be there. These are people who want to be loved and idolised to fill their inner emptiness. I remember hearing Russell Brand saying that the reason he has a sex addiction is because he has something missing inside, he lacks inner contentment with his own being and so needs to approval and sexual love of others to fill this emptiness and also Geri Halliwell from the Spice Girls was heard on the radio talking about her new book and in an on-air conversation she said something along the lines of ‘it still doesn’t fill the emptiness’. And I think this emptiness is common with many of these stars.

Some musicians are great of course and make awesome music but even John Lennon himself was a member of the OTO and his death was likely a result of him becoming too much of a free agent and the OTO and Freemasons, exercise the power of life and death over their initiates and they can exercise this power using spiritual agencies which can possess human beings, rendering them dangerously mentally ill and capable of any evil against a person who is spiritually unprotected.

The problem is, these people are infecting the rest of the world with their egregious characters and setting themselves up as an object of envy for many people who  may start to feel de-localised from the self as they are more and more exposed to these media puppets and their dubious values: one wants to be like them and one envies them, so as is the case with children they start to absorb the moral values (or lack of them) associated with the content of the song and not to mention the video which is often chock full of Illuminati imagery and overt simulated sexual activity. Usually some under-dressed woman dry-humping something or someone while black dancing demons jump about in the background.
The second reason these people tend to be up there on TV is because they are  members of a secret society or other. Most sportspeople are freemasons and there is something hiding in the dark heart of the football world and it is child abuse and paedophilia and the recent suicide of former Chelsea striker Gary Speed  as a result of being abused as a child, leads one to wonder if there is perhaps a high price young boys have to pay in order to make it in professional sport. Some reports suggest something of a paedophile casting couch which the boys have to go through in order to make  progress in the game.

This extract from a Telegraph indicates that Gary Speed had a very special place in convicted paedophile Barry Bennell’s (former football scout sentenced to 9 years for 23 counts of child abuse) esteem.

“There is no suggestion that he had been abused by Bennell. However, one of the six victims Bennell admitted to abusing suggested that the coach had referred to Speed, Davies and himself as “favourites”. He told the newspaper that Bennell used to refer to Speed as one of his “protégés”.

And in 2012 there was a special celebration of 150 years of the Football Association which show clearly the roots of professional football.

“It was on this very site 150 years ago that Ebenezer Cobb Morley and his friends met in what was then the Freemasons’ Tavern, ” said Bernstein. “They changed the world by producing the first laws of the game. Their original handwritten minute book is on display here today.”
In America they had the Penn State child sex abuse scandal with former assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky, using his charity organisation The Second Mile as a cover. In fact in recent times there has been an explosion  in convictions of child molesting football coaches:
Women’s football coach: Anthony Chattell
Football coach: Roy Morris
Gateshead Football coach: Kane Hutchison
Chelsea’s children football coach Shane Hughes
Welsh paedo football coach:
In fact football coaching and scouting appears to be, on sheer number of newspaper reports and sentences, the favoured domain of paedophiles using a position of authority and influence to abuse boys and girls.
Hollywood is no doubt the same, there are paedophile talent scouts and all kinds of opportunities for paedophiles to access children in the film industry, and I suspect they are successfully keeping a very tight lid on this in the news. Indeed I have no doubt that America has the same infection by Freemasonic paedophiles as does the UK, except for whatever reason, the press are more tightly controlled and perhaps certain people less uncompromising when it comes to the issue of leaks. This is perhaps why there have been so many recent unexplained or suspicious deaths in the American entertainment industry courtesy of the Star-Whackers. Peaches Geldof is the most obvious recent victim of Star Whackers and it seems we have them in the UK too.

It is my belief that Peaches was murdered for spilling some of the beans and naming on Twitter the women who apparently let their children be abused by paedophile front-man Ian Watkins. Of course the media twisted it to turn the attention on Peaches and accused her of causing offence, but the women themselves were charged along with Watkins so why were they allowed to remain anonymous? Just to apparently protect their children’s anonymity but how does that help the rest of the UK help identify the dangerous perverts? It seems in this instance to be a convenient loop-hole for protecting the identity of someone guilty of being a menace to the public.

Why did the police close the investigation into find the drug dealer who apparently poisoned her with heroin? “Detectives said they had “exhausted all lines of inquiry” trying to find out who supplied her with the Class A drug.”

I find this very hard to believe, especially with someone with such an entourage of family and friends who would likely know something about who Peaches hung around with or who she got her drugs from.

It seems to me that Ian Watkins and the women who helped Watkins abuse their children, were all part of the OTO, and were engaging no doubt in some evil Crowley sex-magick. Peaches knew something and blew the whistle against her own people, because she had to do what she thought was right, and she paid for this with her life. This is the reason they make you take death oaths, it’s pretty stupid to sign your life away to these people like this, and any time they consider you have breached their oaths of secrecy and mutual protection then they will kill you. Hardly seems worth it does it? But this is the price many of the highest paid most over-promoted celebrities in the world, if not all, celebrities must pay for the doors of fame, riches and success to open to them.

Here for instance is a list of rumoured OTO members:

Jay-Z, John Lennon, Jimmy Page, David Bowie, Rihanna, Sting, Russell Brand, Daryl Hall, Paul McCartney, Kanye West, Madonna, Mick Jagger, Johnny Cash, Beyoncé Knowles, Ozzy Osbourne, Jim Morrison, Adam Lambert, Timothy Leary,  Marilyn Manson , Stanley Kubrick, Chris Martin, James Franco, Behemoth, Mudvayne, Carcass, Ronnie James Dio, John Frusciante, Bruce Dickinson, George Lucas, Phil Anselmo, Alan Moore, Aleister Crowley , Grant Morrison, Peaches Geldof, John Carradine, Graham Bond, Murder City Devils, Alejandro Jodorowsky, Andy Wachowski and  Lana Wachowski, Kenneth Anger, Stiv Bators,  Lon Milo Duquette.

I did wonder why Franco appears troubled these days in his movies and has lost the easy going goofy innocence of his older films, and I suppose someone like Brand who himself was sexually molested as a child and was taken by his father to visit prostitutes, indicates a not entirely healthy version of sexuality. And indeed so it is that sexual abuse tends to makes the child sexually aware at a young age and as result they have a different relationship to sexuality as the rest of us. Most homosexuals were abused as boys by men or even women. Freddie Mercury was famously sexually abused by his nanny, he even wrote a  verse about her in the song Fat Bottom Girls:

“Hey I was just a skinny lad
Never knew no good from bad
But I knew love before I left my nursery
Left alone with big fat Fanny
She was such a naughty nanny
Heap big woman, you made a bad boy out of me”

This talk of not knowing ‘good from bad’ is almost an evocation of the innocence of Adam before the fall. What does he mean by this? Did he eat the forbidden fruit of the snake Nakash (Hbr: The occult) and get involved in OTO Sex Magick at an early age along with people like Russell Brand, Amy Winehouse and Beyonce? Is it any wonder these people are so sexualised and indeed that their whole identity revolves around sexuality: all their songs, their whole performance, their very lives. Russell Brand is a perfect example of this, it’s very hard to take his attempt at politics seriously when he’s basically known as a guy with a serious sex addiction. Jeez, someone give Ol’ Russ a joint and get his mind off his dick. This also accounts for the overt sexualisation of young girls by these OTO popstars because sexuality defines their very being.
There seems to be nothing behind them except aggressive sado-masochistic sexual activity and the need to sing and dance about it. This is also similar of the gay rights movement in the West which is a very aggressive and all permeating campaign to oppress normality and make sexually damaged people feel perfectly normal, and woe to anyone who would say that being gay is ‘not’ normal. There’s a reason they represent than less than 10 percent of a population and it usually has to do with the presence of paedophiles who managed to access this 10 percent when they were still children. If there were no paedophiles then I suspect there would be very few homosexuals in the world. This isn’t a dig at gays. This is just a scientific fact which no one really wants to talk about, namely the connection between child abuse and a later abnormally developing sexuality. Whether this becomes homosexuality, lesbianism or just a heterosexual sex addiction which is what most of these stars seem to be presenting in their media.


“Given her own dabbling in heroin and casual sex, particularly during a rootless period when she lived in Los Angeles a few years ago, it is perhaps natural that the troubled offspring of Bob Geldof and Paula Yates should be attracted to such a liberal school of thought. And if Peaches’ own interest is so shallow, heaven knows what her impressionable — and mostly very young — fans will take from it.”
A former FBI agent, Ted Gundersen, who investigated Satanic circles in LA, found that Crowley’s teachings about ‘raising demons to do one’s bidding’ suggested human sacrifice, preferably of ‘an intelligent young boy’.”
Instead of loving some cult celebrity figure people need to remember to love themselves. Loving yourself basically means being happy and satisfied with who you are. It is very difficult to do that when we are daily exposed to the life of luxury and excess which these celebs lead and which guy out there hasn’t at one point wanted to be a famous footballer or rock musician? Children are the biggest victims of these cults. They start to feel that their own reality is not good enough. Such was the effect of the film Avatar where children were reportedly crying after the film that they couldn’t stay in the Avatar 3d world. And this is their greatest weapon, this is why they have Celebs. They are here to steal your reality and that of your children and also give you the faint sense of unease that you aren’t as rich and
successful as they are. Often these ‘stars’ are very rarely what they seem to be, and no clearer depiction of the sordid cult of celebrity was the evil goat-man Jimmy Savile. That such a man was apparently the first to introduce disco culture instead of watching live acts. Savile, according to himself managed to get young people to come to his nightclub and listen to a record player and public-address system instead of actually watching a real musical performance. Also it was Savile who was probably the biggest celebrity during a great part of the 60’s 70’s and 80’s.

An unprecedented period of reign for this OTO demon to run amok, with the full support of the British media, the Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and even Prince Charles. Savile called Prince Philip ‘The Boss’ and spoke almost with awe and fear when he spoke of him, much in contrast with the way he talks about his conversations with the Queen or Prince Charles. One wonders what role in this story is held by a man who Jimmy Savile himself described as :”The Boss” : the quasi German Prince Philip.
This personality cult is so destructive because it gave people like Savile unfettered access apparently to the UK children’s homes where he abused children. This acquiescence to the appearance of things and to the owner of ‘celebrity’ to indeed transcend the normal laws of the land and float God like and benevolent like a noxious mediatised vapour. The current crop of mediatised vapours to my eye include Man-Hunter Emma Watson and ‘kicking in tight pants’ woman Angelina Jolie Reborn in Rise of the UN Earth Goddess (It’s a bit like Tomb Raider but with more meetings about population reduction).
And so all our children see these artificial  images being presented to them and they pick and choose which cult they wish to follow. Many young girls followed the One Direction cult for a long time. Leading them nowhere. Others want to be wizards so they start looking into Ouija boards and Aleister Crowley. But all the while they’re also being exposed to a deliberately overtly sexualised and valueless music culture. Insane songs which value subservience and abuse “Hit me baby one more time.” But are all of an overtly sexual nature with allusions to fellatio and anal sex, all being contained within the paltry selection of metaphors the songs choose. For instance it should be common knowledge that ‘getting freaky’ and ‘I’m a freak’ are all black culture euphemisms for anal sex. Of course I don’t include Thom Yorke’s song ‘Freak’ as part of the anal-sex agenda. It’s a good song. Precisely the kind of powerful and lyrically meaningful songs which have lately all been replaced by music from the 24 hour OTO Sexatron.
You’d better watch what you choose to watch and just how much of their culture and values do you want to assimilate from sex-culty people like  Russell Brand or Jenifer Lopez. 
Recently I found myself in a little OTO nest in Camden Town. The following is verbatim the odd conversation I ended up having after a night of virtually stumbling into a black gang initiation involving a rubber glove which was left draped over a urinal and also offers of cocaine and a couple of strangely underage girls who seemed to be tagging around some of the people and a nasty strange sort of ‘cult’ atmosphere along with an unexpected confrontation with a strange ‘Jewish’ Zionist who seemed to be somehow mixed up in it all:

“When I went back to the bar I noticed that a few people including the bar-staff were sniffing and touching their noses and looking a big spacey. I went outside for a cigarette and remarked that most of the people here including seemed to be using these guys’ coke.

In front of me stood a short fat hairy man with a red face. He greeted me and asked me if I knew who I was. The strange thing was that as soon as he said this all of the thirty odd people outside suddenly scattered in all directions, like a kind of dissolved flash-mob. 

And I couldn’t get over the strong impression that him addressing me was a signal for everyone around who presumably were part of this thing with black gangs and coke or whatever it was. 

I asked him for a cigarette and he gave me a one willingly and asked me where I was from. I told him. He then told me that he was from Israel. 

I told him I lived in Morocco and he seemed surprised and said:
“Aren’t you scared?”
he seemed scared for me and I just smiled in disbelief.
“Why would I be scared?” and I immediately dismissed him as a lunatic of some kind. But he got excited and told me that he was from Morocco.
“Were you born there?”
“No, I was born in Israel but my parents are from Morocco.”

It seemed strange to see a man like him here, I didn’t quite understand what a man like this was doing here at all. His presence, like the presence of the black drug gangsters initiating each other in pub toilets, was somehow an imposition. Then he leapt into a strange sort of sales-pitch for the state of Israel, and I wondered if this could be connected to the spooky events of the evening. Was the free cocaine part of it too? If I had been coked up I wonder if I would be more receptive to this hairy red faced short little Israeli man. He told me all about the Hebrew patriarchs and I told him my man was Jesus.

He then went into an incredible spiel blending mathematics with religion, going on about the generations of man and asking me to make daft little calculations about how many generations ago Jesus lived. I think part of it was an attempt to bamboozle me with numbers and  getting me to give answers and also affirm his calculations, in a sort of rhetoric of acquiescence to  make me more receptive to his ultimate message whatever that turned out to be. Maybe this is what religious mind control looks like.

“So now, you like Jesus, so how many generations from now to Jesus? 1 generation is 25 years.”
“So 60 generations?”
“Yes, so 60 generations, so how many to Abraham, 120, 60 more than Jesus. Right?” I nodded.
“And  how many to Noah. Ten more generations, seventy generations before Jesus am I right?” I shrugged.

He continued: “And now, how many from Abraham to Adam. Remember they lived longer in those days because they were closer to God but we can call it 20 more generations! And Adam was the perfect man, and Noah was almost as perfect and was spared by God  and Abraham was next in perfection and chosen by God, and then a long time later comes Jesus.” His idea was as clear as it was ridiculous, that because Abraham was older than Jesus that he was better.  

Because he was closer to Adam who was according to this man ‘more perfect’ than Jesus despite the story of the fall from paradise. It was certainly a strange kind of theology.

“Do you know the story of Abraham and Sodom and Gomorrah!” I said I did.
“That Abraham made  a deal with God that God would not destroy the city if 50 good men could be found in it. Then he gradually convinced God to accept a smaller and smaller number of good men to be found because he knew there were so few. Until God accepted not to destroy Sodom if 10 good men were to be found there.” I wondered to myself if he was trying to tell me something about the nature of Zionist terror, that they first corrupt the culture in order to find as few righteous just people within it giving them the excuse they need to act for ‘God’ and destroy it. Rather like the League of Shadows from Batman Begins.
“We are animals” He said suddenly “We have to protect our family” I didn’t know quite where he was going with this but suddenly he had become quite bellicose and seemed to be rousing himself to some new religiously inspired madness.

“If I attacked you you would need protection wouldn’t you?
He seemed to jeer at me.
“In ancient times I would fight you.” He said and I stopped him short:
“Hang on I there, I’d give you a pretty good run for your money. I can go nuts if I need to.” 
He backed off and stopped trying to physically intimidate me:
 “We need a big war to sort everything out in the middle east. We need to be safe from our enemies.”
“Your enemies?”
“The Muslims! We need answers.”
“I have the answers.” I said, because I did, I was drunk. Anything’s possible when you’re drunk.

I smiled at him in his angry bellicose fluster and in my drunken messianic righteous King guise I disarmed his diatribe and showed him I wouldn’t be joining his strange little club.
He looked at me and walked off.  He either didn’t understand or had to admit that he had totally failed to convince me that Israel should be allowed to instigate a huge world war to kill all its Muslim neighbours.  

14 thoughts on “The Occult Cult of Celebrity and the Erosion of the Self.

    Satan comes from Zoroastrianism, which Ezra the Scribe brought back from Babylon and created Talmudic Judaism, which Prophet Jesus keeps attacking in the Gospels (Matthew ch 15; Matthew ch 23; John ch 8).

    EVIL COMES FROM THE HEART/MIND OF MAN (Jeremiah 17:9; James 1:12-24)

  2. Thanks for your comment. May I ask if you believe in the existence of demonic beings and discarnate spirits? The fallen angels and such? I have to say the evidence for a whole pantheon of inter-dimensional demons/aliens is very strong. So many testimonies throughout history of witches and occultists trafficking with these beings. I personally also experienced demonic harrassment over a short period as a result of a kundalini activation. If you accept the existence of the demonic beings then it is quite possible that that they have leader or one who is preeminent in the astral dimension…..


    71. Those who sexually abuse boys may not commune even when death approaches.
    72. If a widow has intercourse and then marries the man, she may only commune after five years' penance. If she marries another man instead, she is excluded from communion even at the time of death. If the man she marries is a Christian, she may not receive communion until completing ten years' penance, unless illness makes earlier communion advisable.
    73. A Christian who denounces someone who is then ostracized or put to death may not commune even as death approaches. If the case was less severe, he or she may commune in less than five years. If the informer was a catechumen, he or she may be baptized after five years.
    74. Those who are false witnesses commit a crime and are to be excluded. If their action did not bring about death, and they explain the reasons for their testimony, they shall be excluded for two years. If their explanation is not accepted by the assembled clergy, they are excluded for five years.
    75. If someone falsely accuses a bishop, presbyter, or deacon of a crime and cannot offer evidence, he or she is excluded from communion even at the time of death.
    76. If a deacon confesses that he had committed a mortal crime before ordination, he is excluded from communion and must complete three years' penance. If, however, the sin is disclosed by someone else, he must complete five years' penance before being accepted as a layman to receive communion.
    77. If a deacon serving a community without a bishop or presbyter baptizes, the bishop shall then give his blessing to those baptized. If someone dies before receiving the blessing, that person is to be regarded as justified by his or her faith.
    78. If a Christian confesses adultery with a Jewish or pagan woman, he is denied communion for some time. If his sin is exposed by someone else, he must complete five years' penance before receiving the Sunday communion.
    79. Christians who play dice for money are to be excluded from receiving communion. If they amend their ways and cease, they may receive communion after one year.
    80. Slaves who have been freed but whose former masters are yet alive may not be ordained as clergy.
    81. A woman may not write to other lay Christians without her husband's consent. A woman may not receive letters of friendship addressed to her only and not to her husband as well.


  4. "The ideas of the ruling class are, in every age, the ruling ideas: i.e., the class which is the dominant material force in society is at the same time its dominant intellectual force. The class which has the means of material production at its disposal, has control at the same time over the means of mental production."

    The gross immorality in Hollywood that makes its way on the screen and thus influences the masses reflects the lives of those who operate within it. An intimate friend of the late Steve McQueen related:

    "He'd kill for a part in a movie…he'd suck anyone's [expletive]…he'd get f—– or f— anyone who'd get him a part in a show…then he'd wish-he'd pray- that person would have a heart attack or a stroke and die, and then there would be no way for anyone to know how McQueen had got the part."

    This disgusting ambition is what keeps the infamous casting couch warm and desirous hopeful actors willing. Hollywood insider, Phyllis Diller, clarifies this fact:

    "The casting couch is the name of the game in Hollywood. I know there are stars, especially women, who have made a career from sexual favors."

    Would you invite a person whom you knew to be ethically bankrupt and an absolute moral degenerate into your home to influentially instruct your wife, your husband, and your children or loved ones? These are the very ones that America invites into their home every night via the television to submissively share their lives with.

    Biblically condemned spiritual conundrums regularly occur in Hollywood. Faye Dunaway said that the ghost of Joan Crawford is haunting her. Actress Jean Seberg believed that her "devils" kept her from ever being free. She stated:
    "The devils will stop that sort of stuff in a second. They ride right here. (Touching her collar bone with her fingers) Sitting here and here. There's one on each side…these are both unfriendly influences. They tell me to run my car into other cars, or drive off a cliff."

    A friend later reflected on her life and pin pointed the cause as the "acting classes at Columbia Studios…[which] had the power to influence Jean's devils." Like countless others in the Hollywood movie star system, this lead to psychiatric hospitals and suicide. Actor Sal Mineo was in regular contact with psychics and spoke of the "vibrations" of James Dean's spirit that haunted him, stating, "I've got to get him off my back because I don't want to join him down there." Mineo was murdered under mysterious circumstances. Is fame worth the extorted fees that Satan demands of his servants of the silver screen?

    As Alan Alda declared:

    "There's plenty of money to be had…But you also lose your soul."

    The Pharisees were hardly ignorant of the trauma felt by molested children. To complicate redress, the Talmud says a rape victim must wait until she was of age before there would be any possibility of restitution. She must prove that she lived and would live as a devoted Jewess, and she must protest the loss of her virginity on the very hour she comes of age. "As soon as she was of age one hour and did not protest she cannot protest anymore." (10)

    The Talmud defends these strict measures as necessary to forestall the possibility of a Gentile child bride rebelling against Judaism and spending the damages awarded to her as a heathen – an unthinkable blasphemy! But the rights of the little girl were really of no great consequence, for, "When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this (three years and a day) it is as if one put the finger into the eye." The footnote says that as "tears come to the eye again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years." (11)
    In most cases, the Talmud affirms the innocence of male and female victims of pedophilia. Defenders of the Talmud claim this proves the Talmud's amazing moral advancement and benevolence toward children; they say it contrasts favorably with "primitive" societies where the child would have been stoned along with the adult perpetrator.

    Actually, the rabbis, from self-protection, were intent on proving the innocence of both parties involved in pedophilia: the child, but more importantly, the pedophile. They stripped a little boy of his right to "throw guilt" on his assailant and demanded complicity in sex from a little girl. By thus providing no significant moral or legal recourse for the child, the Talmud clearly reveals whose side it is on: the raping rabbi.

    Child rape was practiced in the highest circles of Judaism . This is illustrated from Yeb. 60b:
    "There was a certain town in the land of Israel the legitimacy of whose inhabitants was disputed, and Rabbi sent R. Romanos who conducted an inquiry and found in it the daughter of a proselyte who was under the age of three years and one day, and Rabbi declared her eligible to live with a priest."

    The footnote says that she was "married to a priest" and the rabbi simply permitted her to live with her husband, thus upholding "halakah" as well as the dictum of Simeon ben Yohai, "A proselyte who is under the age of three years and one day is permitted to marry a priest." (12)
    These child brides were expected to submit willingly to sex. Yeb. 12b confirms that under eleven years and one day a little girl is not permitted to use a contraceptive but "must carry on her marital intercourse in the usual manner."

    In Sanhedrin 76b a blessing is given to the man who marries off his children before they reach the age of puberty, with a contrasting curse on anyone who waits longer. In fact, failure to have married off one’s daughter by the time she is 12-1/2, the Talmud says, is as bad as one who "returns a lost article to a Cuthean" (Gentile) – a deed for which "the Lord will not spare him." (13) This passage says: "… it is meritorious to marry off one’s children whilst minors."
    The mind reels at the damage to the untold numbers of girls who were sexually abused within Judaism during the heyday of pedophilia. Such child abuse, definitely practiced in the second century, continued, at least in Babylon, for another 900 years.
    9 Sanhedrin 55a.
    10 Kethuboth 11a.
    11 Kethuboth 11b.
    12 Yebamoth 60b.
    13 Sanhedrin 76b.


    In Ritual Bathhouses of the Jewish Orthodoxy, Children Are Systematically Abused
    By Christopher Ketcham Nov 12 2013

    Rabbi Nuchem Rosenberg, the lone whistleblower among the Satmar, a powerful Hasidic sect, who recently was the victim of a bleach attack in Williamsburg, Brooklyn.

    Rabbi Nuchem Rosenberg—who is 63 with a long, graying beard—recently sat down with me to explain what he described as a “child-rape assembly line” among sects of fundamentalist Jews. He cleared his throat. “I’m going to be graphic,” he said.

    A member of Brooklyn’s Satmar Hasidim fundamentalist branch of Orthodox Judaism, Nuchem designs and repairs mikvahs in compliance with Torah Law. The mikvah is a ritual Jewish bathhouse used for purification. Devout Jews are required to cleanse themselves in the mikvah on a variety of occasions: Women must visit following menstruation, and men have to make an appearance before the High Holidays, such as Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur. Many of the devout also purify themselves before and after the act of sex and before the Sabbath.
    On a visit to Jerusalem in 2005, Rabbi Rosenberg entered into a mikvah in one of the holiest neighborhoods in the city, Mea She’arim. “I opened a door that entered into a schvitz,” he told me. “Vapors everywhere, I can barely see. My eyes adjust, and I see an old man, my age, long white beard, a holy-looking man, sitting in the vapors. On his lap, facing away from him, is a boy, maybe seven years old. And the old man is having ANAL SEX with this boy.”

    Rabbi Rosenberg paused, gathered himself, and went on:

    “This boy was SPEARED ON THE MAN LIKE AN ANIMAL, LIKE A PIG, and the boy was saying nothing. But on his face—fear. The old man [looked at me] without any fear, as if this was common practice. He didn’t stop. I was so angry, I confronted him.

    HE REMOVED THE BOY FROM HIS PENIS, and I took the boy aside. I told this man, ‘It’s a sin before God, a mishkovzucher. What are you doing to this boy’s soul? You’re destroying this boy!’


    PART 2

    He had a sponge on a stick to clean his back, and he hit me across the face with it. ‘How dare you interrupt me!’ he said. I had heard of these things for a long time, but now I had seen.”

    The child sex abuse crisis in ultra-Orthodox Judaism, like that in the Catholic Church, has produced its share of shocking headlines in recent years. In New York, and in the prominent Orthodox communities of Israel and London, allegations of child molestation and rape have been rampant. The alleged abusers are schoolteachers, rabbis, fathers, uncles—figures of male authority. The victims, like those of Catholic priests, are mostly boys. Rabbi Rosenberg believes around half of young males in Brooklyn’s Hasidic community—the largest in the United States and one of the largest in the world—have been victims of sexual assault perpetrated by their elders. Ben Hirsch, director of Survivors for Justice, a Brooklyn organization that advocates for Orthodox sex abuse victims, thinks the real number is higher. “From anecdotal evidence, we’re looking at over 50 percent. It has almost become a rite of passage.”

    Ultra-Orthodox Jews who speak out about these abuses are ruined and condemned to exile by their own community. Dr. Amy Neustein, a non-fundamentalist Orthodox Jewish sociologist and editor of Tempest in the Temple: Jewish Communities and Child Sex Scandals, told me the story of a series of Hasidic mothers in Brooklyn she got to know who complained that their children were being preyed on by their husbands.

    In these cases, the accused men “very quickly and effectively engage the rabbis, the Orthodox politicians, and powerful Orthodox rabbis who donate handsomely to political clubs.” The goal, she told me, is “to excise the mother from the child’s life.” Rabbinical courts cast the mothers aside, and the effects are permanent. The mother is “amputated.” One woman befriended by Dr. Neustein, a music student at a college outside New York, lost contact with all six of her children, including an infant she was breastfeeding at the time of their separation.


    The official unabridged Soncino Edition of the Talmud published in 1935 was "Translated into English with Notes, Glossary and Indices" by such eminent Talmudic scholars as Rabbi Dr. I. Epstein, Rabbi Dr. Samuel Daiches, Rabbi Dr. Israel W. Slotki, M.A., Litt.D., The Reverend Dr. A. Cohen, M.A.', Ph.D., Maurice Simon, M.A., and the Very Reverend The Chief Rabbi Dr. J.H. Hertz wrote the "Foreword" for the Soncino Edition of the Talmud. The Very Reverend Rabbi Hertz was at the time the Chief Rabbi of England.

    The world's leading authorities on the Talmud confirm that the official unabridged Soncino Edition of the Talmud translated into English follows the original texts with great exactness. It is almost a word-for-word translation of the original texts. In his famous classic "The History of the Talmud," Michael Rodkinson, the leading authority on the Talmud, in collaboration with the celebrated Reverend Dr. Isaac M. Wise states:

    "THE TALMUD IS ONE OF THE WONDERS OF THE WORLD. During the twenty centuries of its existence…IT SURVIVED IN ITS ENTIRETY, and not only has the power of its foes FAILED TO DESTROY EVEN A SINGLE LINE, but it has not even been able materially to weaken its influence for any length of time. IT STILL DOMINATES THE MINDS OF A WHOLE PEOPLE, WHO VENERATE ITS CONTENTS AS DIVINE TRUTH…"

    SANHEDRIN, 55b-55a: "What is meant by this? – Rab said: Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a child above that (2) What is the basis of their dispute? – Rab maintains that only he who is able to engage in sexual intercourse, may, as the passive subject of pederasty throw guilt (upon the actual offender); whilst he who is unable to engage in sexual intercourse cannot be a passive subject of pederasty (in that respect) (3). But Samuel maintains: Scriptures writes, (And thou shalt not lie with mankind) as with the lyings of a woman (4). It has been taught in accordance with Rab: Pederasty at the age of nine years and a day; (55a) (he) who commits bestiality, whether naturally or unnaturally: or a woman who causes herself to be bestiality abused, whether naturally or unnaturally, is liable to punishment (5)."

    This "divine truth" which "a whole people venerate" of which "not a single letter of it is missing" and today "is flourishing to such a degree as cannot be found in its history" is illustrated by the additional verbatim quotations which follow:

    SANHEDRIN, 55b: "A maiden three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband's brother cohabits with her, she becomes his. The penalty of adultery may be incurred through her; (if a niddah) she defiles him who has connection with her, so that he in turn defiles that upon which he lies, as a garment which has lain upon (a person afflicted with gonorrhea)."

    (footnotes) "(2) His wife derives no pleasure from this, and hence there is no cleaving. (3) A variant reading of this passage is: Is there anything permitted to a Jew which is forbidden to a heathen. Unnatural connection is permitted to a Jew. (4) By taking the two in conjunction, the latter as illustrating the former, we learn that the guilt of violating the injunction `to his wife but not to his neighbor's wife' is incurred only for natural but not for unnatural intercourse."

    SANHEDRIN, 69b "Our rabbis taught: If a woman sported lewdly with her young son (a minor), and he committed the first stage of cohabitation with her, -Beth Shammai says, he thereby renders her unfit for the priesthood (1). Beth Hillel declares her fit…All agree that the connection of a boy nine years and a day is a real connection; whilst that of one less than eight years is not (2); their dispute refers only to one who is eight years old.


    PART 2

    KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. "Rabba said, It means (5) this: When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this (6), it is as if one puts the finger in the eye (7), but when a small boy has intercourse with a grown up woman, he makes her as `a girl who is injured by a piece of wood' ".
    (footnotes) "(5). Lit., `says'. (6) Lit., `here', that is, less than three years old. (7) Tears come to the eyes again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years."

    KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. "Rab Judah said that Rab said: A small boy who has intercourse with a grown up woman makes her (as though she were ) injured by a piece of wood (1). Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood."
    (footnotes) "(1) Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood."

    ABODAH ZARAH, 36b-37a. "R. Naham b. Isaac said: They decreed in connection with a heathen child that it would cause defilement by seminal emission (2) so that an Israelite child should not become accustomed to commit pederasty with it…From what age does a heathen child cause defilement by seminal emission? From the age of nine years and one day. (37a) for inasmuch as he is then capable of the sexual act he likewise defiles by emission. Rabina said: It is therefore to be concluded that a heathen girl (communicates defilement) from the age of three years and one day, for inasmuch as she is then capable of the sexual act she likewise defiles by a flux.

    SOTAH, 26b. "R. Papa said: It excludes an animal, because there is not adultery in connection with an animal (4). Raba of Parazika (5) asked R. Ashi, Whence is the statement which the Rabbis made that there is no adultery in connection with an animal? Because it is written, Thou shalt not bring the hire of a harlot or the wages of a dog etc.; (6) and it has been taught: The hire of a dog (7) and the wages of a harlot (8) are permissible, as it is said, Even both of these (9) – the two (specified texts are abominations) but not four (10)…As lying with mankind. (12) But, said Raba, it excludes the case where he warned her against contact of the bodies (13). Abaye said to him, That is merely an obscene act (and not adultery), and did the All-Merciful prohibit (a wife to her husband) for an obscene act?"

    Of the "sacred" Talmudic teachings of the "Sages," preserved since 500 A.D. and taught more widely today than ever before in Talmud-Torah schools in the U.S.A., perhaps nothing better illustrates "fools" with "reprobate minds" than the teaching in the Talmud book of Yebamoth that spittle on the top of the bed curtain proves that a wife has been guilty of adultery, as only lying down face upwards could she have spit up on it. Spitting several feet straight up! The Talmud states: "When a peddler leaves a house and the woman within is fastening her sinnar [breech-cloth] … . If spittle is found on the upper part of the curtained bed she must, said Rabbi, go." Footnote: "Even if there were no witnesses that misconduct took place." Further footnote: "Only the woman lying face upwards could have spat on the spot. Intercourse may, there fore, be suspected."


    Second century Rabbi Simeon ben Yohai, one of Judaism’s very greatest rabbis and a creator of Kabbalah, sanctioned pedophilia — permitting molestation [raping] of baby girls even younger than three! He proclaimed, "A proselyte who is under the age of three years and a day is permitted to marry a priest." (1) Subsequent rabbis refer to ben Yohai’s endorsement of pedophilia as "halakah", or binding Jewish law. (2) Has ben Yohai, child rape advocate, been disowned by modern Jews? Hardly. Today, in ben Yohai’s hometown of Meron, Israel, tens of thousands of orthodox and ultra-orthodox Jews gather annually for days and nights of singing and dancing in his memory.

    References to pedophilia abound in the Talmud. They occupy considerable sections of Treatises Kethuboth and Yebamoth and are enthusiastically endorsed by the Talmud’s definitive legal work, Treatise Sanhedrin.

    The rabbis of the Talmud are notorious for their legal hairsplitting, and quibbling debates. But they share rare agreement about their right to molest three year old girls. In contrast to many hotly debated issues, hardly a hint of dissent rises against the prevailing opinion (expressed in many clear passages) that pedophilia is not only normal but scriptural as well! It’s as if the rabbis have found an exalted truth whose majesty silences debate.

    Because the Talmudic authorities who sanction pedophilia are so renowned, and because pedophilia as "halakah" is so explicitly emphasized, not even the translators of the Soncino edition of the Talmud (1936) dared insert a footnote suggesting the slightest criticism. They only comment: "Marriage, of course, was then at a far earlier age than now." (3)

    In fact, footnote 5 to Sanhedrin 60b rejects the right of a Talmudic rabbi to disagree with ben Yohai's endorsement of pedophilia: "How could they [the rabbis], contrary to the opinion of R. Simeon ben Yohai, which has scriptural support, forbid the marriage of the young proselyte?" (4)
    1 Yebamoth 60b, p. 402.
    2 Yebamoth 60b, p. 403.
    3 Sanhedrin 76a.
    4 In Yebamoth 60b, p. 404, Rabbi Zera disagrees that sex with girls under three years and one day should be endorsed as halakah.

    It was in Babylon after the exile under Nebuchadnezzar in 597 BC that Judaism's leading sages probably began to indulge in pedophilia. Babylon was the staggeringly immoral capitol of the ancient world. For 1600 years, the world’s largest population of Jews flourished within it. [Ashkenazik Shinar ('sin') was a stone throw away from Sodom and Gomorrah – Any questions?]

    As an example of their evil, Babylonian priests said a man's religious duty included regular sex with temple prostitutes. Bestiality was widely tolerated. So Babylonians hardly cared whether a rabbi married [raped] a three year old girl.

    But with expulsion of the Jews ['Edomites, Pharisees, Ashkenazim, Khazars, Sephardim'] in the 11th century AD, mostly to western Christian lands, Gentile tolerance of Jewish pedophilia abruptly ended.

    Still, a shocking contradiction lingers: If Jews want to revere the transcendent wisdom and moral guidance of the Pharisees and their Talmud, they must accept the right of their greatest ancient sages to violate children. To this hour, no synod of Judaism has repudiated their vile practice.

    What exactly did these sages say?
    The Pharisees justified child rape by explaining that a boy of nine years was not a "man" Thus they exempted him from God’s Mosaic Law: "You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination" (Leviticus. 18:22) One passage in the Talmud gives permission for a woman who molested her young son to marry a high priest. It concludes, "All agree that the connection of a boy aged nine years and a day is a real connection; whilst that of one less than eight years is not." (5) Because a boy under 9 is sexually immature, he can't "throw guilt" on the active offender, morally or legally. (6)
    A woman could molest a young boy without questions of morality even being raised: "…the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act." (7) The Talmud also says, "A male aged nine years and a day who cohabits with his deceased brother's wife acquires her (as wife)." (8) Clearly, the Talmud teaches that a woman is permitted to marry and have sex with a nine year old boy.

    5 Sanhedrin 69b.
    6 Sanhedrin 55a.
    7 Footnote 1 to Kethuboth 11b.
    8 Sanhedrin 55b.

    In contrast to Simeon ben Yohai's dictum that sex with a little girl is permitted under the age of three years, the general teaching of the Talmud is that the rabbi must wait until a day after her third birthday. She could be taken in marriage simply by the act of rape. [these were the 'precursors' of Hillary, Pelosi, Kagan, Napolitano, Ginsburg, Boxer, Albright, Abzug, Goldman, Livni, ad nauseam]

    R. Joseph said: "Come and hear! A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabits with her, she becomes his." (Sanh. 55b)

    "A girl who is three years of age and one day may be betrothed by cohabitation …" (Yeb. 57b)
    A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabited with her she becomes his. (Sanh. 69a, 69b, also discussed in Yeb. 60b)

    It was taught: R. Simeon b. Yohai stated: "A proselyte who is under the age of three years and one day is permitted to marry a priest, for it is said, But all the women children that have not known man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves, and Phineas (who was priest, the footnote says) surely was with them." (Yeb. 60b)

    [The Talmud says such three year and a day old girls are] "… fit for cohabitation … But all women children, that have not known man by lying with him, it must be concluded that Scripture speaks of one who is fit for cohabitation." (Footnote to Yeb. 60b)
    The example of Phineas, a priest, himself marrying an underage virgin of three years is considered by the Talmud as proof that such infants are "fit for cohabitation."

    The Talmud teaches that an adult woman’s molestation of a nine year old boy is "not a sexual act" and cannot "throw guilt" upon her because the little boy is not truly a "man." (9) But they use opposite logic to sanction rape of little girls aged three years and one day: Such infants they count as "women," sexually mature and fully responsible to comply with the requirements of marriage.

    The Talmud footnotes 3 and 4 to Sanhedrin 55a clearly tell us when the rabbis considered a boy and girl sexually mature and thus ready for marriage. "At nine years a male attains sexual matureness… The sexual matureness of woman is reached at the age of three."


    Screenwriter and director, Billy Wilder, has had an enormous impact on the public, as substantiated by his numerous Oscars and other film awards. Responsible for famous films like Hold Back the Dawn, Five Graves to Cairo, Double Indemnity, The Lost Weekend, Sunset Boulevard, Stalag 17, Sabrina and The Apartment, Wilder's cinema successes were granted him as he was just another pawn who was utilized with satanic acumen to help abolish society's established code of ethics. His own authorized biographer who worked closely with him, Maurice Zolotow, wrote:
    "Of course, I did not know what I was getting into when I had started this. It became, as all such journeys have become, a journey to find out the secret springs of this most devious and perverse of Hollywood's personalities."

    Wilder loved to transport the viewer into the depravity of his own heart and did this by tricking the censors who sought to enforce the old Hollywood Production Code of Hollywood's "Golden Age." Wilder recalls, "We had to operate cunningly to outwit the censors and this made us write more subtly." What subtleties did he scatter throughout his films? Perversion. In his movie, The Major and the Minor, Wilder admits that the motif was child sexuality, stating:
    "Ray Milland falls in love with Ginger as a twelve year old child. We had here the first American movie about pedophilia. The Major is sexually aroused by her. He can't help himself. I was worried that audiences would be shocked by this story, but it seems that they were not."
    This goes to show that if a story is entertaining and "cute," it can bypass the normal reaction to such filth and translate into apathetic disregard on the slippery slope of corruption. Where did this movie minister of perversion receive his material? Wilder was given his creative material by another supernatural force. In addition to stating that he is "demonically possessed and slightly crazed," Zolotow reports of Wilder:

    "He could not stop his creative machinery from functioning. He was enslaved by his art…One sometimes felt as if one were moved by powerful invisible forces. I forgot to tell you that Wilder never starts a new screenplay without typing two words on the first page: Cum Deo ('With God'). He has a pantheistic feeling about the universe."

    Demon possession leads many from the truths of God to the pantheistic lies of the New Age movement because Satan uses those who will serve him most faithfully in preparing humanity to embrace him as the god of this world. Wilder's responses upon completion of his show make it readily apparent which god he aligned himself with. Scientologist screenwriter of the Sound of Music, Ernest Lehman, recalls:

    "He looked at the heavens and screeched F— you!" It was…a victory cry, as if he were calling out to God and saying, 'I completed this picture despite everything you did to make me surrender.'"

    Dr. Lycurgus Starkey rightly announced on the NBC network: "His movies have overturned all the sexual mores, glorified promiscuity, glamorized prostitution and elevated adultery to a virtue." Dr. Starkey was prophetically right in predicting the social effect and outcome of Wilder's films that we currently face in our day. The atheist author of communism, Karl Marx, explains the reasons why this is so:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Cookie Consent with Real Cookie Banner